Risk Management
Basic Philosophy
We are working to prevent risks that could have grave consequences for management and to minimize damage in adverse events. For these purposes, we identify risks in each function and make decisions on how to respond in Board of Directors, Internal Control Committee and general meetings throughout the company.
An Internal Control Committee headed by the company president identifies key risks, determines measures to counter them, and checks on the progress in executing these measures. In this way, these measures are made more effective.
In addition, initiatives to deal with key risks or unexpected business risks due to political instability or other external factors are discussed regularly by the Board of Directors, and continuous improvements are made.
Moreover, Risk Management and Response Guidelines have been established. These guidelines show the behaviors to adopt to prevent potential risks and to respond to problems appropriately and quickly. Parts of the BCP plan are discussed by the Board of Directors with respect to COVID-19. With consideration of the status of infection spread, actions taken to minimize the impact of COVID-19 include (1) preventing infection by promoting work from home, regulating business trips and visitors, and cancelling company internal events, (2) implementing measures for the event that an infection occurrs in an employee, (3) maintaining our production network by monitoring issues, including at our suppliers, and (4) introducing profit improvement measures.
System Diagram of Internal Control Committee
Response to Key Risks
Operating foundation risks and business strategy risks based on the business environment are assessed from the perspective of impact on operations (financial impact, etc.) and possibility of occurrence (frequency), and key risks are identified.
Key risks are reflected in company policy as important action items, and initiatives are made to mitigate or prevent risks.
Examples of Key Risks
Classification | Main key risks | |
---|---|---|
Size of risk Impact on operations (financial impact, etc.) × Possibility of occurrence (frequency) |
Large |
|
Medium |
|
|
Small |
|
Crisis Management Project in Anticipation of Large-Scale Earthquake Disasters
A crisis management system has been put in place for the event of a massive disaster, such as the predicted Nankai Trough earthquake or natural disasters due to climate change. This system is based on the principles of human life first, community support, and early recovery. Specifically, in addition to infrastructure and system measures based on a crisis management project, resilience training has been conducted more than 160 times for directors and members of antidisaster departments since FY2013. These efforts are based on the company’s belief that improving the skills of response personnel is essential. Specific procedures for the recovery of affected buildings, facilities, and processes have also been established, and for alternative production in a production recovery system.
Recovery training for design drawings and other data is also carried out so that product development can be continued even after disasters. In addition, workshops to strengthen crisis management not only in Toyoda Gosei companies but also at Group companies and suppliers are conducted regularly. Assessments using anti-earthquake measure implementation status check sheets, clarification of weak points with graphs, introduction of responses taken at Toyoda Gosei and other companies, and cooperative preparation of business continuation plans (BCP) are carried out.
■Disaster Response
■Initiatives to Date
Classification | Measures |
---|---|
Facility and equipment measures |
|
System measures |
|
Skills |
|
Strengthening of Global Risk Response
The status of risks, not just domestic but also frequently occurring global risks (tightening supply of parts and raw materials, COVID-19-related operation shutdowns, Ukraine situation and more), is identified, the early situation both in Japan and internationally is grasped (issuance of a weekly BCP), and necessary actions are taken globally. Standardization is also underway so that measurements can be taken by domestic and international locations on their own initiative, strengthening the response to key risks seen in the business environment of each company.
Basic Policy for Cybersecurity Measures
To strengthen the control of confidential information, annual checks of the compliance status of each division based on company confidentiality management regulations are conducted together with onsite audits. Self-inspections are also done at Group companies in Japan and overseas, as well as at major suppliers.
Confidentiality officers are assigned in all departments, and confidentiality education activities are conducted based on information system security operating standards and a confidential information management manual. At domestic and international Group companies and major suppliers, specific measures are stratified and executed based on the size of the impact on Toyoda Gosei and inspection results for cyber risk measures at each company. Regular reports and discussions are conducted in all company boards, and cybersecurity measures are taken together globally.
■Main Cybersecurity Measures
Classification | Measures (domestic and international Group companies and suppliers respond in accordance with the size of the impact) | |
---|---|---|
Prevent leakage due to negligence | Facility and equipment measures |
|
System measures |
|
|
Prevent leakage due to malice | Facility and equipment measures |
|
System measures |
|
|
Educational activities (morale measures) |
|